Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Hank Moody

Matt Barnes or Q Rich?

Barnes or Q?  

32 members have voted

  1. 1. WHICH WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE TODAY?

    • Q Rich
      14
    • Matt Barnes
      18


Recommended Posts

Q is a better shooter and just as good defensively, if not better. Barnes did nothing in the playoffs and then demanded a pay raise. Otis isn't going to give the guy more money when he didn't score or play any defense in the playoffs. I wouldn't have minded keeping Barnes but I am more than happy having Richardson too. The whole Barnes/Richardson thing is pointless. Even if Barnes was indeed better, he'd hardly make us better as a team right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that Q is a better scorer, about the same defender, about the same or better rebounder, and a better locker room guy. HOWEVER, I think that we miss Barnes' cutting to the basket. If Q can add some sort of slashing into his game then he is undeniably better for our team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right now, Barnes. The only thing Q is better at is 3 point shooting and since he's sucking at it now.. he has almost nothing over Barnes imo. Barnes slashing at least was consistent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm tired of people clamoring over arbitrary bull**** like "toughness" and "leadership". Focus on tangible qualities.

 

I'll take Q Rich for the simple fact that guys won't sag off him like he's Rondo.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Barnes was one of the only players who ran fast breaks last year, how many we got now? Dont really expect the former fat boy Q to run too fast.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The stats for both players should have been listed in the opening post so people could get a clearer picture....so I'll add them now:

 

BARNES: .............. Q. RICH.

PER - 17.0 .............. PER - 11.58

FG% - 50 ............... FG% - 38

FT% -77................ FT% - 85

TS% -60 ............... TS% - 52

3pt. % - 35 ............... 3pt.% - 33

Rebs. - 5.3 ............... Rebs. - 4.3

PPG - 8.6 ................ PPG - 7.3

Asists - 1.9 ............... Asists- 1.0

Stls. - .78 ............... Stls. - .48

Blks - .43 ................ Blks. - .13

 

Don't forget....Barnes is known mostly as a defensive player....Q. is noted most for his offense.

 

I almost forgot....games and minutes played are almost identical.

 

You decide....

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The stats for both players should have been listed in the opening post so people could get a clearer picture....so I'll add them now:

 

 

 

Don't forget....Barnes is known mostly as a defensive player....Q. is noted most for his offense.

 

I almost forgot....games and minutes played are almost identical.

 

You decide....

 

Assists, steals, blocks ... Look at the bottom of that list. When I watch the Magic play, I just observe. I miss Matt Barnes toughness and ability to drive on this team. We've become more of a chucker team this year. The stats BallJunkie provided help prove a very important point of what this team is currently missing. Look, if Q Rich can turn his game around and contribute more consistently, I'll be a happy man. Until then -- I miss Matt Barnes on this team. Matt Barnes gets the vote in my book. Thanks for providing the stats, BallJunkie!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×