Jamaal Tinsley waived by the Pacers - will Otis bite?

[ReeceGaines 0]

http://www.nba.com/pacers/news/tinsley_090722.html

 

I suppose a buyout was agreed. The Pacers were possibly in need of the roster spot to make a trade. Questions: can he still play? Which teams will consider hiring him?

[ReeceGaines 0]

http://www.nba.com/pacers/news/tinsley_090722.html

 

I suppose a buyout was agreed. The Pacers were possibly in need of the roster spot to make a trade. Questions: can he still play? Which teams will consider hiring him?

[Nyce_1 311]

for the vet min, why not take a chance on him?

[Diplo 12]

I posted it in Watson thread which is now a PG thread.

[CubanMagic89 1]

No. Please God No.

[Blackhennie 0]

there is no need to take the chance... we have a lot of new players and we don't need the head ache in the locker room... no thanks... we just need a decent back up that won't pout....

[ReeceGaines 0]

i wish we could have scooped up Earl Watson, but he only lasted on the market for around 5 minutes after being waved

[DontPushMe 0]

id much rather get CJ watson, but if somehow we cant work out a deal for him (which imo would be rediculous) tinsley wouldnt be bad if hes cool with being a backup

[robert.ryba1 0]

in before the lock

[star_phenom35 1]

i hope he does

[Marc Acres 3:16 418]

My thinking is that the next pg we bring in should be someone to bring energy and to fight AJ for the back up spot without causing issues. I would also prefer a guy that can play defense, Tinsley does none of those things.

[Berto 338]

- He can't shoot

- He can't play defense

- He's often fat and out of shape

- Indiana paid him 7 million dollars to stay away from them last year

 

I guess what I'm trying to say is, no.