Darthmagic Posted October 15, 2009 Report Posted October 15, 2009 I was listening to realgm radio blog and they said that Cleveland without Lebron would struggle to make the playoffs and that we would be in the same boat if we lost Dwight. I can't disagree more; i think we would be the fifth best team in the league if we lost Dwight. But it had me thinking about Cleveland. Its really not pretty. Cleveland sans Lebron Pg-Mo Williams Sg-Anthony Parker Sf-Jomario Moon pf-Anderson Varejo C-Shaq Orland sans Dwight Pg-Jameer Nelson SG-Vince Carter SF-Mickael Pietrus PF-Rashard Lewis c-Marcin Gortat **** were jacked But what do you think. would we make the playoffs without Dwight? Quote
Darthmagic Posted October 15, 2009 Author Report Posted October 15, 2009 I was listening to realgm radio blog and they said that Cleveland without Lebron would struggle to make the playoffs and that we would be in the same boat if we lost Dwight. I can't disagree more; i think we would be the fifth best team in the league if we lost Dwight. But it had me thinking about Cleveland. Its really not pretty. Cleveland sans Lebron Pg-Mo Williams Sg-Anthony Parker Sf-Jomario Moon pf-Anderson Varejo C-Shaq Orland sans Dwight Pg-Jameer Nelson SG-Vince Carter SF-Mickael Pietrus PF-Rashard Lewis c-Marcin Gortat **** were jacked But what do you think. would we make the playoffs without Dwight? Quote
Sir Raven Posted October 15, 2009 Report Posted October 15, 2009 VC and Rashard could make it to 2nd round? Quote
Captain Hindsight Posted October 15, 2009 Report Posted October 15, 2009 without dwight we're still making the playoffs. probably in the 3-6 seed Quote
Darthmagic Posted October 15, 2009 Author Report Posted October 15, 2009 quote: Originally posted by M4G1C:without dwight we're still making the playoffs. probably in the 3-6 seed Some guys on a realgm radio blog said Orlando and Cleveland are in the same boat without their stars. Lunacy. But there is something that has been bugging me. everyone keeps saying that Boston lost their best player in Kevin Garnett. But in my mind Pierce is their best player, and if he went down i think its bigger than the loss of Garnett. Am i the only one who thinks that? Quote
nbr Posted October 15, 2009 Report Posted October 15, 2009 quote: Originally posted by LinkZ2009:VC and Rashard could make it to 2nd round? and Nelson ain't that bad either. Quote
Darthmagic Posted October 15, 2009 Author Report Posted October 15, 2009 quote: Originally posted by nbr: quote: Originally posted by LinkZ2009:VC and Rashard could make it to 2nd round? and Nelson ain't that bad either. True Dat! I'm looking at that Cleveland lineup and it looks horrible. Quote
Captain Hindsight Posted October 15, 2009 Report Posted October 15, 2009 quote: Originally posted by Darthmagic: quote: Originally posted by nbr: quote: Originally posted by LinkZ2009:VC and Rashard could make it to 2nd round? and Nelson ain't that bad either. True Dat! I'm looking at that Cleveland lineup and it looks horrible. a lot of lineups would look bad if you take the best player off the team.... Quote
Darthmagic Posted October 15, 2009 Author Report Posted October 15, 2009 quote: Originally posted by M4G1C: quote: Originally posted by Darthmagic: quote: Originally posted by nbr: quote: Originally posted by LinkZ2009:VC and Rashard could make it to 2nd round? and Nelson ain't that bad either. True Dat! I'm looking at that Cleveland lineup and it looks horrible. a lot of lineups would look bad if you take the best player off the team.... But i think Cleveland is the worst. Look at our team without Howard. How many teams in the east would dominate us? We could be number 5 in the east with that line-up. Quote
Captain Hindsight Posted October 15, 2009 Report Posted October 15, 2009 quote: Originally posted by Darthmagic: quote: Originally posted by M4G1C: quote: Originally posted by Darthmagic: quote: Originally posted by nbr: quote: Originally posted by LinkZ2009:VC and Rashard could make it to 2nd round? and Nelson ain't that bad either. True Dat! I'm looking at that Cleveland lineup and it looks horrible. a lot of lineups would look bad if you take the best player off the team.... But i think Cleveland is the worst. Look at our team without Howard. How many teams in the east would dominate us? We could be number 5 in the east with that line-up. hence why i said a lot of teams. we're extremely deep, no question. but majority of the league would look bad without their best player. Quote
~O~ Posted October 16, 2009 Report Posted October 16, 2009 Vince Carter Brandon bass Ryan Anderson Jameer Nelson Rashard Lewis Marcin Gortat Anthony Johnson Jason Williams Matt Barnes JJ Redick Michael Pietrus I think we would still be over the top. Quote
deadman54 Posted October 16, 2009 Report Posted October 16, 2009 quote: Originally posted by Darthmagic: quote: Originally posted by M4G1C:without dwight we're still making the playoffs. probably in the 3-6 seed Some guys on a realgm radio blog said Orlando and Cleveland are in the same boat without their stars. Lunacy. But there is something that has been bugging me. everyone keeps saying that Boston lost their best player in Kevin Garnett. But in my mind Pierce is their best player, and if he went down i think its bigger than the loss of Garnett. Am i the only one who thinks that? no i agree kg is just a big man. pierce is their man guy. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.