Fultz4thewin 2,464 Report post Posted February 18, 2017 Gotta hand it to Rob - leaking that Sacramento wanted Vuc and Evan for Boogie but he said no is a valiant effort to boost Vuc's trade value. It's just a shame it's so laughable no one would believe it. You know, that's the most plausible scenario. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nyce_1 311 Report post Posted February 18, 2017 If we had to include a pick for Reggie (not that I would) if send Tor pick and ask for Ellenson. There's our backup stretch 4. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HeHateMe 697 Report post Posted February 18, 2017 Not buying it. If we did, fire Rob now. BS report. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HeHateMe 697 Report post Posted February 18, 2017 If we had to include a pick for Reggie (not that I would) if send Tor pick and ask for Ellenson. There's our backup stretch 4. Agree. I'll send the first if we get Ellenson back. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MagicFanInNevada 51 Report post Posted February 18, 2017 Go back and see if you can find the joke I was messing with you boss Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Murphy13 185 Report post Posted February 18, 2017 Say we trade DJ and Green for Jackson, which I'm not opposed to, what happens when we have Fultz/Ball on the board and an onerous contract/starting caliber Jackson and starting caliber Payton? Run with three pg's I suppose, but we will be otherwise thin across the board. We would HAVE to get a better Mario and AG next year in order to have any shot at the playoffs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HeHateMe 697 Report post Posted February 18, 2017 Say we trade DJ and Green for Jackson, which I'm not opposed to, what happens when we have Fultz/Ball on the board and an onerous contract/starting caliber Jackson and starting caliber Payton? Run with three pg's I suppose, but we will be otherwise thin across the board. We would HAVE to get a better Mario and AG next year in order to have any shot at the playoffs. That move to me changes nothing in the draft. You still draft BPA. An asset is an asset. You can never have to many. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fultz4thewin 2,464 Report post Posted February 18, 2017 That move to me changes nothing in the draft. You still draft BPA. An asset is an asset. You can never have to many. Yup. And point guards take a bit to learn the nba. You draft bpa and roll with it. And you trade Payton this offseason post draft. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Soul Bro 1,422 Report post Posted February 18, 2017 Say we trade DJ and Green for Jackson, which I'm not opposed to, what happens when we have Fultz/Ball on the board and an onerous contract/starting caliber Jackson and starting caliber Payton? Run with three pg's I suppose, but we will be otherwise thin across the board. We would HAVE to get a better Mario and AG next year in order to have any shot at the playoffs. You still believe Payton is a starting caliber PG? He's been benched twice this year, first for Augustin and now for Watson. He's also had a previous but proven coach reportedly quit over him. As to your question, I'd draft BPA, as I think Jackson would be a very solid 6th man. Edit: I also think any thought of the playoffs in the next couple of years is crazy, regardless of what ownership wants. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Captain 24 Report post Posted February 18, 2017 Say we trade DJ and Green for Jackson, which I'm not opposed to, what happens when we have Fultz/Ball on the board and an onerous contract/starting caliber Jackson and starting caliber Payton? Run with three pg's I suppose, but we will be otherwise thin across the board. We would HAVE to get a better Mario and AG next year in order to have any shot at the playoffs. Draft PG and let them figure out who the starter is Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HeHateMe 697 Report post Posted February 18, 2017 Draft PG and let them figure out who the starter is It's really a non issue. If you get Fultz and he ends up nasty from day 1--then you can let Jackson backup or play more minutes at the 2 (which actually works for him) and you have the best PG rotation in the league. Plenty of teams are starved for an upgrade at point--that's an easy trade to make too. If we truly can get Jackson for as little as green and DJ--it's probably about as no brainer of a trade as the Ibaka trade was for Toronto. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Captain 24 Report post Posted February 18, 2017 It's really a non issue. If you get Fultz and he ends up nasty from day 1--then you can let Jackson backup or play more minutes at the 2 (which actually works for him) and you have the best PG rotation in the league. Plenty of teams are starved for an upgrade at point--that's an easy trade to make too. If we truly can get Jackson for as little as green and DJ--it's probably about as no brainer of a trade as the Ibaka trade was for Toronto. Very very true Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
