sharp/7/shooter 23 Report post Posted August 20, 2010 There's no reason you should have gotten 3 negative hits for this comment. I fixed one of them. ditto 1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KLR 5 Report post Posted August 20, 2010 Definitely a good option. I see absolutely no downside to adding Iverson. 1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Give Me Redick All Day 109 Report post Posted August 20, 2010 there's literally no room for him though. we've got three deep at point and three deep at sg. Correct me if I'm wrong, but: Carter/Redick/??? Whose our third SG? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sharp/7/shooter 23 Report post Posted August 20, 2010 Correct me if I'm wrong, but: Carter/Redick/??? Whose our third SG? Air France. Pietrus is classified as a Guard-Forward. Our first or second string SF, our third string SG. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sharp/7/shooter 23 Report post Posted August 20, 2010 Definitely a good option. I see absolutely no downside to adding Iverson. http://vodpod.com/watch/3208342-allen-iverson-facing-alcohol-gambling-issues http://sports.espn.g...tory?id=4975922 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fultz4thewin 2,464 Report post Posted August 20, 2010 There's no reason you should have gotten 3 negative hits for this comment. I fixed one of them. i returned the favor twice. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Penny Hardaway's Ghost 260 Report post Posted August 20, 2010 lol... oh boy... the notion of this is just lulz. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shock Phantom 263 Report post Posted August 20, 2010 I highly doubt that we sign Iverson, but I'm surprised no team has picked him up yet. I'm assuming he'd be willing to sign for the vet min. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gporter 5 Report post Posted August 20, 2010 Him and J Will can just ride the pine together, and be nothing more than blow out game/injury insurance type of players. I don't think it's a big deal if we sign him or not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Emory889 353 Report post Posted August 20, 2010 Him and J Will can just ride the pine together, and be nothing more than blow out game/injury insurance type of players. I don't think it's a big deal if we sign him or not. I have a hard time imagining Iverson and SVG coexisting even if Iverson was starting and playing 40 minutes a night. Can you imagine the circus that would follow if Stan kept him on the bench? Does anyone here think it's a coincidence that the Pistons fan sarcastically said "there's no downside to this"? She's seen first hand what happens when a team wants Iverson to come off the bench. And that was a few years ago when Iverson still had some game left. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fultz4thewin 2,464 Report post Posted August 20, 2010 I have a hard time imagining Iverson and SVG coexisting even if Iverson was starting and playing 40 minutes a night. Can you imagine the circus that would follow if Stan kept him on the bench? Does anyone here think it's a coincidence that the Pistons fan sarcastically said "there's no downside to this"? She's seen first hand what happens when a team wants Iverson to come off the bench. And that was a few years ago when Iverson still had some game left. I think he still has a lot of game left. I just dont think he's mentally capable of contributing to a good team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shock Phantom 263 Report post Posted August 20, 2010 STEIN_LINE_HQ Follow up to lunchtime AI tweet: Source w/knowledge of Orlando's thinking says Magic, like New Orleans, DO NOT have Iverson on their radar 4 minutes ago via UberTwitter https://twitter.com/STEIN_LINE_HQ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
