Lack of Go To Scorer Could Cost Magic Championship (SI LINK)

[no_ma'am 0]

we need a flopper that fakes injuries every time he falls on the ground? Nah...we're good.

 

also vabch, you've once again proven you have no clue what you're talking about. Did you ever consider that our D had a little something to do with the celtics not scoring? Probably not, because espn didn't tell you to think that way. Coming back from a 8 pt defecit in one quarter against an elite team is not easy. Your "we should have been up 10" comment makes you look particularly slow.

[VaBchMagicFan 0]

quote:

Originally posted by no_ma'am:

we need a flopper that fakes injuries every time he falls on the ground? Nah...we're good.

 

also vabch, you've once again proven you have no clue what you're talking about. Did you ever consider that our D had a little something to do with the celtics not scoring? Probably not, because espn didn't tell you to think that way. Coming back from a 8 pt defecit in one quarter against an elite team is not easy. Your "we should have been up 10" comment makes you look particularly slow.

Umm yes the D is the reason but do you realize if a team doesn't score for more than 7 minutes you should score more than 8 points? Are you slow? No one stepped up offensively. Basketball is 2 things offense and defense. So you see you have to score more points than the other team that is how you win. So, when you play great defense and they don't score and you play average to above average offense you get big leads. But when you play great defense and horrible offense teams stay in the game. Make sense?

[VaBchMagicFan 0]

quote:

Originally posted by no_ma'am:

we need a flopper that fakes injuries every time he falls on the ground? Nah...we're good.

 

also vabch, you've once again proven you have no clue what you're talking about. Did you ever consider that our D had a little something to do with the celtics not scoring? Probably not, because espn didn't tell you to think that way. Coming back from a 8 pt defecit in one quarter against an elite team is not easy. Your "we should have been up 10" comment makes you look particularly slow.

And if a team whose big men are Big Baby, Perkins, Schalabrine, and Mikki Moore is elite than well its not. This is not last years Celtics by any means. This team is not really that good and we should have won this game easily at home. Give your team some more credit and give the other team less. Trust me Cleveland would much rather play Boston than us and would probably sweep Boston or 4-1.

[Walddo 0]

quote:

Originally posted by CElticsRus:

And if its a championships trophy you want, perhaps we will lend Orlando one of our 17(soon to be 18) for the summer

 

HAHAHAHA. You think you have a flying chance against the Lebrons? THATS funny.

[onedollerbills 1]

[CElticsRus 0]

quote:

Originally posted by Walddo:

quote:

Originally posted by CElticsRus:

And if its a championships trophy you want, perhaps we will lend Orlando one of our 17(soon to be 18) for the summer

 

HAHAHAHA. You think you have a flying chance against the Lebrons? THATS funny.

 

We are the defending world champions..we have faces adversity countless times this playoff season. The Lebrons haven't faces ****. He goes on camera the other day talking about being down by one point is adversity and a test for his team..thats ****in laughable. When our playoff tested team meets his team that played the Hawks(lol) and the Pistons(lol some more) it is going to be a huge punch in the mouth for him and his "lebrons"

[WhereMagicHappens 0]

LOL

 

"go-to" scorer - go to where? nah just kidding.

 

this cliche is getting so old.

 

The one who scores is the "go-to" scorer, right? Or is it, the who everyone goes to, to score is the "go to" scorer............ uh, right?

 

That can be anyone, seriously. Shard should've had the ball more in the fourth. Lee came out of nowhere and came through. Turk made a couple of forced shots - so why is a lack of a go to scorer, going cost the Magic a championship? oh and last I checked it's still the 2nd round.

 

just my thoughts, but anyone can be the go to scorer in any game. every game is different and if you're Glen Baby Davis, you can be the go to guy too.

 

SI just want's to hype up the series, wich is fine - but lacking a go to scorer?

[onedollerbills 1]

quote:

Originally posted by CElticsRus:

quote:

Originally posted by Walddo:

quote:

Originally posted by CElticsRus:

And if its a championships trophy you want, perhaps we will lend Orlando one of our 17(soon to be 18) for the summer

 

HAHAHAHA. You think you have a flying chance against the Lebrons? THATS funny.

 

We are the defending world champions..we have faces adversity countless times this playoff season. The Lebrons haven't faces ****. He goes on camera the other day talking about being down by one point is adversity and a test for his team..thats ****in laughable. When our playoff tested team meets his team that played the Hawks(lol) and the Pistons(lol some more) it is going to be a huge punch in the mouth for him and his "lebrons"

 

lol your team will be done after next season say hello to the lottery again, i love how celtic fans think act like they are the **** but just managed some trade to set them up for 2 years.

 

o and who is your go to scorer dont tell me its pierce because he has no game what so ever expect drive and hope for a foul and allen can only get open off screens.

[Kramer 0]

quote:

Originally posted by VaBchMagicFan:

quote:

Originally posted by no_ma'am:

we need a flopper that fakes injuries every time he falls on the ground? Nah...we're good.

 

also vabch, you've once again proven you have no clue what you're talking about. Did you ever consider that our D had a little something to do with the celtics not scoring? Probably not, because espn didn't tell you to think that way. Coming back from a 8 pt defecit in one quarter against an elite team is not easy. Your "we should have been up 10" comment makes you look particularly slow.

Umm yes the D is the reason but do you realize if a team doesn't score for more than 7 minutes you should score more than 8 points? Are you slow? No one stepped up offensively. Basketball is 2 things offense and defense. So you see you have to score more points than the other team that is how you win. So, when you play great defense and they don't score and you play average to above average offense you get big leads. But when you play great defense and horrible offense teams stay in the game. Make sense?

 

What a god awful point, even for you. So you have walked yourself into a corner here, by claiming that the Celtics couldn't score against us late you make it clear that they lack a go-to-scorer and in doing so, you make it clear that you don't need a go to scorer to win the Title.

[Kramer 0]

[VaBchMagicFan 0]

quote:

Originally posted by Kramer:

quote:

Originally posted by VaBchMagicFan:

quote:

Originally posted by no_ma'am:

we need a flopper that fakes injuries every time he falls on the ground? Nah...we're good.

 

also vabch, you've once again proven you have no clue what you're talking about. Did you ever consider that our D had a little something to do with the celtics not scoring? Probably not, because espn didn't tell you to think that way. Coming back from a 8 pt defecit in one quarter against an elite team is not easy. Your "we should have been up 10" comment makes you look particularly slow.

Umm yes the D is the reason but do you realize if a team doesn't score for more than 7 minutes you should score more than 8 points? Are you slow? No one stepped up offensively. Basketball is 2 things offense and defense. So you see you have to score more points than the other team that is how you win. So, when you play great defense and they don't score and you play average to above average offense you get big leads. But when you play great defense and horrible offense teams stay in the game. Make sense?

 

What a god awful point, even for you. So you have walked yourself into a corner here, by claiming that the Celtics couldn't score against us late you make it clear that they lack a go-to-scorer and in doing so, you make it clear that you don't need a go to scorer to win the Title.

Even the best scorers don't score all the time. Plus Pierce was on the bench for a lot of that with foul trouble. What is your point?

[VaBchMagicFan 0]

quote:

Originally posted by Kramer:

And if you read the whole thread, I know what a concept. You would see that I wrote that Nelson might be that player but I want him to do it for more than half a season. Turk was Mr. 4th quarter last year and look what happened this year.