Natmayo

I am glad he gets to make some decent cash. I don't begrudge him at all. The shelf life of a top athlete is very short and he has to make the most of it. Good luck Matt.

Its amazing that after Rev pokes a big hole in his thinking, the op never returns to rebuke. Its fun fodder but geez, get your ducks in a row before looking like a fool.

Good solid signing. Go Otis.

Barnes is a good defensive player and I really enjoyed his play and toughness. But I don't think he gets 5 mil for 4 or 5 years anywhere. I would also like a bit more point production out of our starting SG. My best to him and I hope he gets what he wants.

quote: Originally posted by jack l j:jj has a lot of value to the magic in many areas. on and off the court. he puts people in the seats. he is well liked in orlando which is a huge asset. i see the magic doing everything possible to keep him. i personally hope he stays and believe he will only leave if it is to a good organization with a chance win. Agreed. I like that Redick has done whatever it takes to get playing time and improve his game. That being said, a career in the NBA can be short lived and if there is a suitor offering a good long term deal, it has to be a serious consideration to him, no matter the situation.

quote: Originally posted by Drunk on Mystery: quote: Originally posted by murphy13:He used to let rooks ride the pine, that was his memo for awhile(and dont use Wade as a counterpoint-thats an exception). But nowadays I dont think thats the case. Udonis Haslem started 23 games his rookie year, and played big minutes off the bench the rest of that season. He was undrafted. That was Stan's first year as a head coach. I don't know where this "SVG won't play rookies" myth came from, but it's never been remotely true. I agree. SVG has shown that he will play any lineup that he deems our best chance to win the game. We can question any of his decisions from our armchair position, but the guy is all about winning.

quote: Originally posted by Blinkz:Happy Fathers day to all you Magic Fathers! Same to you pal. Family is everything and I am truly blessed. My best to all of you

For financial reasons, he would be crazy not to. I hope we can keep him but I understand the rationale

quote: Originally posted by jack daniel 999:gametime decision Jack if I haven't said it before, It's good to have you back and I hope all is well with you and your family.

quote: Originally posted by BravesMagicBucs:My first post in a game thread!! This is it!! Time to win this one and take this series back to Orlando!! Go Magic!! Welcome and enjoy. Some may complain but I think this forum is one of the best. No predictions for me either, just give it your all guys and lets see what happens. GO MAGIC!!!!

Ill agree with JVG on his comments last night NBA...Where soft happens. I miss the days of hard playoff basketball. Those Bulls/Pistons, NY/Miami series and others were so exciting to watch compared to todays game. I really don't think either tech was justified

Vince is having a tough series, it happens. Rashard hasn't exactly lit it up either. Bottom line, both have the ability to turn it around and really help us and we can only hope it happens.

quote: Originally posted by Netrunner2k2: quote: Originally posted by Natmayo: quote: Originally posted by Netrunner2k2: quote: Originally posted by Natmayo: quote: Originally posted by Netrunner2k2: quote: Originally posted by KillingInTheNameOf I think the calls for JJ in the starting lineup are a premature overreaction. JJ defends Allen well, but he's a huge liability when Boston forces switches. The Magic can't defend Boston being undersized at 4 positions! I think this sentiment also overlooks the fact JJ was awful in the 1st half and excelled while the Magic were freerolling down huge. I like what JJ gives the Magic...but this is PANIC talk. I don't think so. I think if Barnes' back was healthy there wouldn't be a discussion because he would have played more and likely better. JJ moving to the starting lineup isn't an adjustment, its a premature lineup change that isn't necessary after a loss. JJ played well, was a great spark off the bench but you just don't change everything you do because of a loss. Stick with the lineup that got us where we are. I was disappointed in this game but give credit where its due. The Celts played better defense in spurts than I saw in either of their other series. We will make adjustments and return the favor. But no need for a significant lineup change quite yet I'm not saying that because of a loss, I'm saying that because Barnes' back isn't good and that hindered him. The healthy lineup got this team where it is today. Like I said, if Barnes' back was OK, then it is a different story. If Barnes played like crap but was healthy, this wouldn't be a discussion. It is so it is. If he can't go, then you bring Pietrus in and let him guard Pierce. Vince can not guard Pierce and would probably do a better job on Allen. But JJ is fine where he is, working well with JWill and bringing that energy off the bench. But we are up 1-0 if Dwight makes a couple of shots and we aren't having this discussion Hey, you could be right and he is what we need to spark the team. It is true that if Dwight wasn't asleep this isn't a discussion. However, I also know that JJ got the start and was on Allen last year and Allen didn't have a great series offensively for the most part. Neither did JJ for that matter (though I think JJ is better this year than last) and the Magic ended with the series win. This is a clearly better Celtics team than last year. I'm not saying JJ couldn't guard Allen similar to last year. But I still go back to, I think we need to make more of an adjustment on Pierce and limit him. He handed it to us today.

quote: Originally posted by Netrunner2k2: quote: Originally posted by Natmayo: quote: Originally posted by Netrunner2k2: quote: Originally posted by KillingInTheNameOf I think the calls for JJ in the starting lineup are a premature overreaction. JJ defends Allen well, but he's a huge liability when Boston forces switches. The Magic can't defend Boston being undersized at 4 positions! I think this sentiment also overlooks the fact JJ was awful in the 1st half and excelled while the Magic were freerolling down huge. I like what JJ gives the Magic...but this is PANIC talk. I don't think so. I think if Barnes' back was healthy there wouldn't be a discussion because he would have played more and likely better. JJ moving to the starting lineup isn't an adjustment, its a premature lineup change that isn't necessary after a loss. JJ played well, was a great spark off the bench but you just don't change everything you do because of a loss. Stick with the lineup that got us where we are. I was disappointed in this game but give credit where its due. The Celts played better defense in spurts than I saw in either of their other series. We will make adjustments and return the favor. But no need for a significant lineup change quite yet I'm not saying that because of a loss, I'm saying that because Barnes' back isn't good and that hindered him. The healthy lineup got this team where it is today. Like I said, if Barnes' back was OK, then it is a different story. If Barnes played like crap but was healthy, this wouldn't be a discussion. It is so it is. If he can't go, then you bring Pietrus in and let him guard Pierce. Vince can not guard Pierce and would probably do a better job on Allen. But JJ is fine where he is, working well with JWill and bringing that energy off the bench. But we are up 1-0 if Dwight makes a couple of shots and we aren't having this discussion

quote: Originally posted by Netrunner2k2: quote: Originally posted by KillingInTheNameOf I think the calls for JJ in the starting lineup are a premature overreaction. JJ defends Allen well, but he's a huge liability when Boston forces switches. The Magic can't defend Boston being undersized at 4 positions! I think this sentiment also overlooks the fact JJ was awful in the 1st half and excelled while the Magic were freerolling down huge. I like what JJ gives the Magic...but this is PANIC talk. I don't think so. I think if Barnes' back was healthy there wouldn't be a discussion because he would have played more and likely better. JJ moving to the starting lineup isn't an adjustment, its a premature lineup change that isn't necessary after a loss. JJ played well, was a great spark off the bench but you just don't change everything you do because of a loss. Stick with the lineup that got us where we are. I was disappointed in this game but give credit where its due. The Celts played better defense in spurts than I saw in either of their other series. We will make adjustments and return the favor. But no need for a significant lineup change quite yet