Murphy13 185 Report post Posted July 25, 2013 I don't understand what's so hard about putting someone on ignore. Why waste time and internet space to bicker about stupid ish. Like seriously whoever floated the idea to trade for Aldridge was probably trolling and you all fell for it. Ignore that **** and move on. How was I trolling about the suggestion? The point was to start conversation about something other than tanking, ie: using our assets and putting together a good-ish team while still having a decent pick in a loaded draft. LA was just a vessel in the conversation, the rest is up to DOM's delusions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
magicblue 315 Report post Posted July 25, 2013 How was I trolling about the suggestion? The point was to start conversation about something other than tanking, ie: using our assets and putting together a good-ish team while still having a decent pick in a loaded draft. LA was just a vessel in the conversation, the rest is up to DOM's delusions. Do people understand the difference between tanking and just not being good? One is purposeful, the other is a result of a flawed, incomplete, or an otherwise inept roster. We aren't going to lose on purpose, we're going to lose because we're not that good. There's nothing wrong with losing while developing young players and maintaining roster flexibility, there is however something wrong with intentionally losing. We're in the former category, not the latter Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ILoveOrlandoMagic 12 Report post Posted July 25, 2013 Magic signed Ronnie Price from Trailblazers, I never heard of him.... http://www.nba.com/magic/news/magic-sign-ronnie-price I hope he can contribute if Jameer goes down Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ibn Battuta 127 Report post Posted July 25, 2013 How was I trolling about the suggestion? The point was to start conversation about something other than tanking, ie: using our assets and putting together a good-ish team while still having a decent pick in a loaded draft. LA was just a vessel in the conversation, the rest is up to DOM's delusions. because people told you it was a bad idea and you still kept going on about it. Trading for Aldridge accomplishes nothing, certainly not the things you say. Aldridge is the franchise player, so any trade would come at a hefty price. That means we'd lose a lot of our young players for a small short term gain. We won't make the playoffs with Aldridge, but we'd certainly fall out of the top ten. Historically speaking it's rare to grab franchise players outside of that range. So if Aldridge is not a franchise worthy player for us, and trading for him will hurt our chances of landing one, WHY should we trade for him? This isn't even considering why LMA would accept being traded from one rebuilding team to another. He might as well stay in Portland since they're ahead of us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fultz4thewin 2,464 Report post Posted July 25, 2013 Anyone else worried about 2009 magic players being implicated in the biogenesis thing? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crazyhorse81 247 Report post Posted July 25, 2013 Anyone else worried about 2009 magic players being implicated in the biogenesis thing? Can we plant fake evidence in Howard's locker when we visit this season?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ML6 520 Report post Posted July 26, 2013 Anyone else worried about 2009 magic players being implicated in the biogenesis thing? I've been out of the loop for the last few days... what is this? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Captain Hi-Top 791 Report post Posted July 26, 2013 Anyone else worried about 2009 magic players being implicated in the biogenesis thing? Nope, even if it comes out that they were, we didn't win a title, so.... meh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BN 44 Report post Posted July 26, 2013 Anyone else worried about 2009 magic players being implicated in the biogenesis thing? Nope, but I am worried about them being implicated of having ties with Miami. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mj fx 0 Report post Posted July 26, 2013 because people told you it was a bad idea and you still kept going on about it. Trading for Aldridge accomplishes nothing, certainly not the things you say. Aldridge is the franchise player, so any trade would come at a hefty price. That means we'd lose a lot of our young players for a small short term gain. We won't make the playoffs with Aldridge, but we'd certainly fall out of the top ten. Historically speaking it's rare to grab franchise players outside of that range. So if Aldridge is not a franchise worthy player for us, and trading for him will hurt our chances of landing one, WHY should we trade for him? This isn't even considering why LMA would accept being traded from one rebuilding team to another. He might as well stay in Portland since they're ahead of us. Aldridge? Your joking right...we want iggy...we want iggy ..my advice is this....jordan and pippen=championships.. Wade and lebron=championships...not one by jordan and pippen...not one by wade and lebron...but multiple championships...how....by building a team aroumd dynamic shooting gaurds and small forwards...all that athleticism wins titles....yes it does. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mj fx 0 Report post Posted July 26, 2013 Nope, but I am worried about them being implicated of having ties with Miami. Hold them players accountable...not this team...go after dwight howard if he broke the rules.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mj fx 0 Report post Posted July 26, 2013 I should be close to my ten post by now¿ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
