LaVar 108 Report post Posted February 16, 2013 Bledsoe is also a freak athlete. I like his game and his potential. I'm not sure if he can compete with the elite PGs out there though. What do you think the Clips would want in exchange? This has been suggest: Magic get: Bledsoe and Buttler Clips get: JJ and smith (or Jones) There is also this Garnett problem (Click) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harklessonfire 40 Report post Posted February 16, 2013 The thing is, I don't want Butler...at all. Deandre and Bledsoe for Garnett. I'd do that if I were the Cs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaVar 108 Report post Posted February 16, 2013 The thing is, I don't want Butler...at all. Deandre and Bledsoe for Garnett. I'd do that if I were the Cs Butler is an expiring contract next year. If we pick up butler, we dont have to give up a pick or a young player. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harklessonfire 40 Report post Posted February 16, 2013 Butler is an expiring contract next year. If we pick up butler, we dont have to give up a pick or a young player. I'd trade Baby and Redick for Deandre and Bledsoe. I would offer Afflalo first instead of Redick though Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaVar 108 Report post Posted February 16, 2013 I'd trade Baby and Redick for Deandre and Bledsoe. I would offer Afflalo first instead of Redick though they really want to get red of butler. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NittanyBuc 757 Report post Posted February 17, 2013 I'd trade Baby and Redick for Deandre and Bledsoe. I would offer Afflalo first instead of Redick though Clippers would be getting screwed in that deal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jec 427 Report post Posted February 17, 2013 Jennings is 23. I think that gets overlooked a lot. He's also a 4th year pro, meaning we have a pretty good understanding of what his game is. He's a very athletic chucker who gambles to make steals. He's rail thin as well. None of this is likely to suddenly change. I feel I should clarify: I do not think he is a bad player. It's just that in four years his game has practically been the same; his poor field goal percentage being the biggest issue(3 of 4 seasons under 40% is just bad). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mauro Pedrosa 1,032 Report post Posted February 17, 2013 Clippers would be getting screwed in that deal. I still wouldn't want DeAndre. Maybe if you could combine DeAndre's athleticism and dunking with Big Baby's shooting.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jareth Cutestory 678 Report post Posted February 17, 2013 I still wouldn't want DeAndre. Maybe if you could combine DeAndre's athleticism and dunking with Big Baby's shooting.. wut Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NittanyBuc 757 Report post Posted February 17, 2013 I still wouldn't want DeAndre. Maybe if you could combine DeAndre's athleticism and dunking with Big Baby's shooting.. Or maybe if he had Mutombo's size, Hakeem's touch, and Dirk's range... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harklessonfire 40 Report post Posted February 17, 2013 Clippers would be getting screwed in that deal. Yeah, they'd be getting screwed if they accept this rumored Garnett deal too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ibn Battuta 127 Report post Posted February 17, 2013 Yeah, they'd be getting screwed if they accept this rumored Garnett deal too. Garnett right now would make them instant contender and favorite to win it all. And you're only giving up a backup PG. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites