The Ryan Anderbads 27 Report post Posted February 24, 2011 Otis didn't pull off impossible trades. Fire him. Didn't know getting a backup C was an impossible trade. My apologies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Franchero MVP 391 Report post Posted February 24, 2011 Otis didn't pull off impossible trades. Fire him. I didnt know that trading our best Assets like Gortat for nothing in return so that we can't do anything else for the rest of the year was a position Otis DIDNT put himself into. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marc Acres 3:16 418 Report post Posted February 24, 2011 Didn't know getting a backup C was an impossible trade. My apologies. After last nights game backup C is the least of our worries. Impossible trade as in getting an impact player, not a backup C. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Berto 338 Report post Posted February 24, 2011 Didn't know getting a backup C was an impossible trade. My apologies. Yes, because getting a backup center is going to make the lynch mob happy. Nice try. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Franchero MVP 391 Report post Posted February 24, 2011 After last nights game backup C is the least of our worries. Impossible trade as in getting an impact player, not a backup C. How is it not one of our worries? Is Dwight going to be playing 48 minutes a game from here on out? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Berto 338 Report post Posted February 24, 2011 I didnt know that trading our best Assets like Gortat for nothing in return so that we can't do anything else for the rest of the year was a position Otis DIDNT put himself into. Gortat clearly would have landed us Melo, Deron, and 6 cheesecakes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Ryan Anderbads 27 Report post Posted February 24, 2011 Yes, because getting a backup center is going to make the lynch mob happy. Nice try. So let's just chill and let Dwight play 50 mins every game and when he gets in foul trouble in the playoffs and just roll over and play dead? Kk. Sounds good. Don't fire otis. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magicman28 295 Report post Posted February 24, 2011 Otis didn't pull off impossible trades. Fire him. Didn't know that trading away half of a Finals team roster would BE possible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Franchero MVP 391 Report post Posted February 24, 2011 Gortat clearly would have landed us Melo, Deron, and 6 cheesecakes. Who said it had to be one of those people? And whether you like it or not, a big man like Gortat is what ALOT of teams needed. He could have been included in a great package. We should have at least gotten Steve Nash out of that deal. edit: you're gonna eat alot of 'i didnt know' posts now hahaha. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marc Acres 3:16 418 Report post Posted February 24, 2011 How is it not one of our worries? Is Dwight going to be playing 48 minutes a game from here on out? Re-read my post LEAST OF OUR WORRIES. LEAST AS IN LOWEST ON THE LIST OF MANY WORRIES. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Berto 338 Report post Posted February 24, 2011 So let's just chill and let Dwight play 50 mins every game and when he gets in foul trouble in the playoffs and just roll over and play dead? Kk. Sounds good. Don't fire otis. Regulation games are only 48 minutes. He played 43 yesterday. The worse the team plays, the more he plays. It's an irrelevant point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ibn Battuta 127 Report post Posted February 24, 2011 Gortat clearly would have landed us Melo, Deron, and 6 cheesecakes. only if they are NY style cheesecakes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
