Magicman28

I look at the entire body of work. If at 27 Fournier just now gets it, it won’t be long until he loses it. I believe Fultz, like some of us said, puts him in his fitting role. Takes the ball out of his hands to create and instead lets a better fitting player create for him. Same with AG. My thing with AG though is, over the entire body of his work, with us having a limited amount of ways to improve mind you, it’s now is he worth keeping or better utilized as an trade piece?

Thought he can opt out?

I don’t like the idea of resigning two guys who played/playing their best in contract years. That’s what a treadmill team does.

Lol yeah. Was thinking the same thing.

Frustrating part about all this is it’s the same **** different day. No matter what coach we have, what front office we have, the same **** continues.

We need to alter this roster.

Drummond is only 26. Damn. Thought he was 30-31. I’d be for a trade for him.

I agree. Which is why I don’t care for a Derozan trade.

No but if you can, you make moves to put those two in a better position to succeed and future.

Maybe not so much in regular season but in the playoffs (if that’s still the goal) I’m seriously concerned about the offense.

If a player like DD can’t or won’t shoot 3’s is on a team that struggles with offensive consistently and paired with Fultz, a PG who right now isn’t shooting 3’s, it makes it easier for defenses to take away the high percentage shot for both players and for others as well.

If he could just hit a few threes a game...

I don’t know why. Dude can score but not a shooter.

Right but in that mold. Maybe not on that level.

We need a Klay Thompson type of player.