Magicman28

That has shown to be inefficient and doesn’t work. If there’s no more moves, they AGAIN failed to address our issues (it isn’t just shooting).

Annnd still no PG

Why? He can get hot sure but he makes the worst boneheaded decisions with the ball. This would be going in the wrong direction.

Appreciate it. That makes some sense. The whole Trey Murphy thing. I mean he’s good but does he really solve our offensive issue? Just doesn’t seem smart with all that money involved.

I can’t see any of the stuff some of yall are sharing.

Any deal for Garland will almost always include Suggs. It’s why I wouldn’t do it. I do not want to see Suggs 4 times a year along side DM.

I know. I’m just saying with our need to get offense Reaves would have to be the focal point

A deal with LA would have to include Reaves.

It’s a disaster because Weltman who finally changes his tune would literally be doing what he always does. Finding old guys near the end of their careers thinking it solves the issue while having to address it again down the road. I don’t have an issue with CJ at 34 who’s on a decent contract while he find other options to get better. I have an issue of trading assets for a CJ who’s 34 making 30 million and calling it a day thinking “we’re set now guys!’

He is 34 years old making 30 million a year. Have you watched a game? He’s slowed down a lot. This isn’t CJ from Portland days. This would be a disaster of a move if this is answer to our backcourt issues.

I wouldn’t doubt it. It’s what I expect from this FO .

It’s not a label. It’s a skill. The data says our issues are a lot bigger than shooting. We are one of the worst teams to get good shots and two players who have the highest usage rate amongst most of the NBA are contributing to it. As good as they are, they are not Luka. Paolo knows this. It’s why he has publicly asked for a PG.

I just don’t know if the options are there. Suggs is not a PG and most of the other options without possibly including him aren’t as well.

That’s why I brought it up. New CBA makes it almost impossible to have Paolo/Franz/Suggs with Garland. If we want a big name, we’re going to more than likely have to give up on the big 3.

Would yall trade Suggs for Garland?