BMP 424 Report post Posted September 24, 2010 Yeah, because every team wants someone who is just going to bail on them when their contact is up. :rolleyes: Don't act like he has completely no say in the matter. He really doesn't. He can hint that he's not going to sign the extension but it doesn't stop either team from making a deal, and with the amount of money he'll lose by not signing the extension, he'll also take a hit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Manu Ginobili 61 Report post Posted September 24, 2010 Melo to Nets changes absolutely NOTHING in the big picture. Best case scenario for NJ: 5/8 in the East, 1st round Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JRam027 26 Report post Posted September 24, 2010 This trade doesn't make much sense for the Nets, IMO. Do they really want Melo for one year THAT bad? After coming up empty this summer, yeah, they really do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Franchero MVP 391 Report post Posted September 24, 2010 After coming up empty this summer, yeah, they really do. You think they're not going to lose anything? They are probably going to have to trade some of their better players for a guy whos gonna stick around for a year. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miller4Prez66 545 Report post Posted September 24, 2010 By doing this deal, if Melo leaves the Nets are left with Brook Lopez and nothing else. They would be getting rid of Favors and Harris in this deal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shock Phantom 263 Report post Posted September 24, 2010 I wish Melo would just get traded so all of this speculation from "sources" would stop. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JRam027 26 Report post Posted September 24, 2010 You think they're not going to lose anything? They are probably going to have to trade some of their better players for a guy whos gonna stick around for a year. I never said it makes sense, but it's something the Nets are willing to do. They're desparate. They failed to land a big name FA this summer so trading for a superstar is not beyond them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miller4Prez66 545 Report post Posted September 24, 2010 From what I hear, if he agrees to an extension with the Nets this deal may be done. If I were Melo, I wouldn't even think about signing a long term deal to stay with a team that is gutting out their talent to get him there. If he stayed in Denver, that Nuggets team would be better than the Nets would be with this proposed trade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shock Phantom 263 Report post Posted September 24, 2010 NYDNInterNets Stefan Bondy Reliable source: Carmelo has approved the deal to the Nets. 12 minutes ago Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Franchero MVP 391 Report post Posted September 25, 2010 NYDNInterNets Stefan Bondy Reliable source: Carmelo has approved the deal to the Nets. 12 minutes ago :svgsad: It's on NBA.com now. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
My 6th Rebuild 6 Report post Posted September 25, 2010 Melo wanting to go to the Nets is silly. How are the Nets with no Harris or Favors better than the Nuggets? This is Stephon Marbury all over again when he wanted out of Minnesota and got traded to the Nets. With the Nuggets significantly weaker, the only teams the Lakers have to worry about are the Thunder, Blazers, and Jazz. The West is the new East. Now if Favors turns out to be Garnett or Duncan like Avery Johnson says than the Nuggets will be laughing their asses all the way to the bank while the Nets continue to be bounced in the first round year after year. Seriously though it makes no sense for Melo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VCplusD12 91 Report post Posted September 25, 2010 This is stupid, I'd rather have Vince than Devin Harris. Orlando could offer much better pieces Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
