Nets Release Dooling

[UBBALLER8 248]

quote:

Originally posted by jecMagicMan:

If we can pick him up for cheap to play spot minutes as a combo guard, I'm all for it. We don't need him to run the offense. I am in no way biased.

 

I'm so happy this sig is back.

 

Only if we can now sign the guy.

[Murphy13 185]

quote:

Originally posted by ThisIsTheYear:

Do you have any PG in mind, echo? That is, a better backup option than Dooling?

 

Has anyone locked up Shaun Livingston yet?

[Jareth Cutestory 678]

As much as I like the Livingston option, you do realize he played well in late March and April right? On a lottery Wizards team? With Earl Boykins?

[Fultz4thewin 2,464]

quote:

Originally posted by murphy13:

quote:

Originally posted by ThisIsTheYear:

Do you have any PG in mind, echo? That is, a better backup option than Dooling?

 

Has anyone locked up Shaun Livingston yet?

 

nobody can lock anybody up for 10 more days.

[jec 427]

quote:

Originally posted by Jareth Cutestory:

As much as I like the Livingston option, you do realize he played well in late March and April right? On a lottery Wizards team? With Earl Boykins?

 

Uh..

 

What is this supposed to mean?

[Jareth Cutestory 678]

quote:

Originally posted by jecMagicMan:

quote:

Originally posted by Jareth Cutestory:

As much as I like the Livingston option, you do realize he played well in late March and April right? On a lottery Wizards team? With Earl Boykins?

 

Uh..

 

What is this supposed to mean?

It's supposed to mean that his inflated stats may be leading people on this forum overrating him a bit.

[jec 427]

quote:

Originally posted by Jareth Cutestory:

quote:

Originally posted by jecMagicMan:

quote:

Originally posted by Jareth Cutestory:

As much as I like the Livingston option, you do realize he played well in late March and April right? On a lottery Wizards team? With Earl Boykins?

 

Uh..

 

What is this supposed to mean?

It's supposed to mean that his inflated stats may be leading people on this forum overrating him a bit.

 

I'm more impressed with the fact that he's playing at all. We already know he's very talented.

[Captain Hi-Top 791]

quote:

Originally posted by ThisIsTheYear:

Do you have any PG in mind, echo? That is, a better backup option than Dooling?

 

Honestly, no, but that doesn't mean I have to jump on the "Dooling for back up" bandwagon, does it?

 

I'm thinking that's a whole that will be filled once Otis makes a move or two in a few weeks.

[jec 427]

quote:

Originally posted by echo4papa:

quote:

Originally posted by ThisIsTheYear:

Do you have any PG in mind, echo? That is, a better backup option than Dooling?

 

Honestly, no, but that doesn't mean I have to jump on the "Dooling for back up" bandwagon, does it?

 

I'm thinking that's a whole that will be filled once Otis makes a move or two in a few weeks.

 

God help us if we resorted to Dooling being our backup point guard. That's not what he'd be brought here to be. That's not what the "bandwagon" is favor of, anyway.

[Miller4Prez64 1]

quote:

Originally posted by Jareth Cutestory:

quote:

Originally posted by jecMagicMan:

quote:

Originally posted by Jareth Cutestory:

As much as I like the Livingston option, you do realize he played well in late March and April right? On a lottery Wizards team? With Earl Boykins?

 

Uh..

 

What is this supposed to mean?

It's supposed to mean that his inflated stats may be leading people on this forum overrating him a bit.

 

You mean like Al Thornton did? Oh wait, he didn't even put up inflated numbers on a lottery Wizards team.

 

 

[Captain Hi-Top 791]

quote:

Originally posted by jecMagicMan:

quote:

Originally posted by echo4papa:

quote:

Originally posted by ThisIsTheYear:

Do you have any PG in mind, echo? That is, a better backup option than Dooling?

 

Honestly, no, but that doesn't mean I have to jump on the "Dooling for back up" bandwagon, does it?

 

I'm thinking that's a whole that will be filled once Otis makes a move or two in a few weeks.

 

God help us if we resorted to Dooling being our backup point guard. That's not what he'd be brought here to be. That's not what the "bandwagon" is favor of, anyway.

 

Then why is TITY askign me who I think would be a better option???? I already said I wouldn't mind seeing Dooling here, just not as Jameer's back up. Bad TITY, BAD TITY!

[jec 427]

quote:

Originally posted by echo4papa:

quote:

Originally posted by jecMagicMan:

quote:

Originally posted by echo4papa:

quote:

Originally posted by ThisIsTheYear:

Do you have any PG in mind, echo? That is, a better backup option than Dooling?

 

Honestly, no, but that doesn't mean I have to jump on the "Dooling for back up" bandwagon, does it?

 

I'm thinking that's a whole that will be filled once Otis makes a move or two in a few weeks.

 

God help us if we resorted to Dooling being our backup point guard. That's not what he'd be brought here to be. That's not what the "bandwagon" is favor of, anyway.

 

Then why is TITY askign me who I think would be a better option???? I already said I wouldn't mind seeing Dooling here, just not as Jameer's back up. Bad TITY, BAD TITY!

 

I think TITY's question was just a legitimate question and had nothing to do with Dooly Boy. We all kind of agree with each other on this, so this is boring. I'm gonna go finish reading that VCdaCarter argument.