Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
jec

Magic in 6 with math

Recommended Posts

I guaranSHEED that the Magic will win the next for games to shock the 2 some 0.5 million people watching these finals.

 

Game 1 - Magic lose by 20

 

Game 2 - Magic lose by 5

 

Coincidence?(yes) No. That's a 15 point improvement. Therefore:

 

Game 3 - Magic win by 10

 

Game 4 - Magic win by 25

 

Game 5 - Magic win by 40

 

Game 6 - Magic win by 55

 

WRITE IT DOWN ON YOUR FAVORITE PLACE MAT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guaranSHEED that the Magic will win the next for games to shock the 2 some 0.5 million people watching these finals.

 

Game 1 - Magic lose by 20

 

Game 2 - Magic lose by 5

 

Coincidence?(yes) No. That's a 15 point improvement. Therefore:

 

Game 3 - Magic win by 10

 

Game 4 - Magic win by 25

 

Game 5 - Magic win by 40

 

Game 6 - Magic win by 55

 

WRITE IT DOWN ON YOUR FAVORITE PLACE MAT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uh... Fail.

 

We MIGHT win the next four, but we won't win by 25, 40, let alone 55. That's just childish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by AddiFB:

Uh... Fail.

 

We MIGHT win the next four, but we won't win by 25, 40, let alone 55. That's just childish.

 

The math is undeniable. My theory is based in fact, whereas your "refutation" has no basis in anything substantial.

 

The math adds up, so to speak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by ThisIsTheYear:

Yes

 

YES

 

YESSSS!!!!

 

I agree with this thread! Well done, brethren.

 

Finally, someone who understands the basic principles of the pythagorean theorem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by Kberto:

This thread is worse than herpes.

 

I gave your sister herpes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by jecMagicMan:

quote:
Originally posted by ThisIsTheYear:

Yes

 

YES

 

YESSSS!!!!

 

I agree with this thread! Well done, brethren.

 

Finally, someone who understands the basic principles of the pythagorean theorem.

 

I thought it was Newton's law?

 

Impressive

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×