Air Gordon 156 Report post Posted April 13, 2017 I will not accept this. The last 5 years have been an absolute wasteland in the lottery. It's been totally random. The last team to get a sure fire, slam dunk prospect still sucks!(Anthony Davis, yeah 6 years ago). We have to do better. Karl-Anthony Towns is a slam dunk, sure fire prospect... You could even make a solid argument for Towns over Davis. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hootie249 293 Report post Posted April 13, 2017 Karl-Anthony Towns is a slam dunk, sure fire prospect... You could even make a solid argument for Towns over Davis. Yeah they still suck! I sense a pattern. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fultz4thewin 2,464 Report post Posted April 14, 2017 Yeah they still suck! I sense a pattern. Gotta give them a couple years Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HeHateMe 697 Report post Posted April 14, 2017 Yeah they still suck! I sense a pattern. So did nearly every superstar that was under 23. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HeHateMe 697 Report post Posted April 14, 2017 I will not accept this. The last 5 years have been an absolute wasteland in the lottery. It's been totally random. The last team to get a sure fire, slam dunk prospect still sucks!(Anthony Davis, yeah 6 years ago). We have to do better. Towns Wiggins Simmons Drafts are always somewhat random in every-sport but the one constant is the closer to the top you pick the better chances you have of obtaining a better player. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HeHateMe 697 Report post Posted April 14, 2017 Let's do a what if scenario. There are a few teams in the top 10 that have clear cut players that would be perfect based on fit: Minnestoa = Markennan Philly = Monk Boston = Jackson Who is our perfect "fit"? Not talking BPA here, who is the player you think would fit best with our current roster? So no trade scenarios, no what ifs, just which player do you think would be our perfect fit at 5 with our current roster? For the sake of things, let's assume Fultz/Ball/Jackson are out of the equation here. I'd say Tatum. Payton/Mario/Ross/Tatum/AG The ultimate small ball lineup. Obviously this would be a situational lineup but fun nonetheless. It would probably be more Payton/Fournier/Tatum/AG/Biz. I think that true 3 in Tatumwould be the perfect fit for us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mauro Pedrosa 1,032 Report post Posted April 14, 2017 Let's do a what if scenario. There are a few teams in the top 10 that have clear cut players that would be perfect based on fit: Minnestoa = Markennan Philly = Monk Boston = Jackson Who is our perfect "fit"? Not talking BPA here, who is the player you think would fit best with our current roster? So no trade scenarios, no what ifs, just which player do you think would be our perfect fit at 5 with our current roster? For the sake of things, let's assume Fultz/Ball/Jackson are out of the equation here. Monk I guess Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fultz4thewin 2,464 Report post Posted April 14, 2017 Let's do a what if scenario. There are a few teams in the top 10 that have clear cut players that would be perfect based on fit: Minnestoa = Markennan Philly = Monk Boston = Jackson Who is our perfect "fit"? Not talking BPA here, who is the player you think would fit best with our current roster? So no trade scenarios, no what ifs, just which player do you think would be our perfect fit at 5 with our current roster? For the sake of things, let's assume Fultz/Ball/Jackson are out of the equation here. I'd say Tatum. Payton/Mario/Ross/Tatum/AG The ultimate small ball lineup. Obviously this would be a situational lineup but fun nonetheless. It would probably be more Payton/Fournier/Tatum/AG/Biz. I think that true 3 in Tatumwould be the perfect fit for us. Tatum monk or smith really. None are perfect but they fix some things. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mauro Pedrosa 1,032 Report post Posted April 14, 2017 Tatum monk or smith really. Yep. It's a pretty nice draft class Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HeHateMe 697 Report post Posted April 14, 2017 Tatum monk or smith really. None are perfect but they fix some things. Yea it's not that clear cut for us. For as bad as we are we don't have 1 gaping hole just a bunch of smaller ones. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fultz4thewin 2,464 Report post Posted April 14, 2017 Yea it's not that clear cut for us. For as bad as we are we don't have 1 gaping hole just a bunch of smaller ones. I think the hole is "guy who can manufacture offense by himself" and those three guys all have some signs of being that guy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ibn Battuta 127 Report post Posted April 14, 2017 Let's do a what if scenario. There are a few teams in the top 10 that have clear cut players that would be perfect based on fit: Minnestoa = Markennan Philly = Monk Boston = Jackson Who is our perfect "fit"? Not talking BPA here, who is the player you think would fit best with our current roster? So no trade scenarios, no what ifs, just which player do you think would be our perfect fit at 5 with our current roster? For the sake of things, let's assume Fultz/Ball/Jackson are out of the equation here. I'd say Tatum. Payton/Mario/Ross/Tatum/AG The ultimate small ball lineup. Obviously this would be a situational lineup but fun nonetheless. It would probably be more Payton/Fournier/Tatum/AG/Biz. I think that true 3 in Tatumwould be the perfect fit for us. Fournier is not a 2 it's not his best position. Payton-Ross-Fournier-Tatum-AG would be our fun lineup. Or just trade AG probably our best asset. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
