VCplusD12 91 Report post Posted February 7, 2012 Firstly, let me tell you that this came up during a heated discussion between myself and some folks during our game against the Clippers. I ask the mods kindly to not lock or delete this thread as the discussion is serious and we need to find an answer. I think my veteran status at this forum should allow me to have this thread going for a while My point was that the famous superman "dunk" wasn't really a dunk, but a lay-up or lay-down if you will. The other guys said it was so I came up with this brilliant argument: If Dwight had jumped behind the 3 point line and thrown the ball with tremendous force downwards (their definition of a dunk) would you guys call it a 3 point dunk? My point is that to dunk you need to touch the rim. I present you guys with an illustration to clarify my point So, would you call it a dunk? 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NittanyBuc 757 Report post Posted February 7, 2012 If the Queen had balls, would you refer to her as "King"? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Animorphfan 10 Report post Posted February 7, 2012 Yes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VCplusD12 91 Report post Posted February 7, 2012 If the Queen had balls, would you refer to her as "King"? Yes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jec 427 Report post Posted February 7, 2012 A dunk is throwing the ball down into the basket. Technically speaking, that would be a three point dunk. I would agree that the Superman dunk was overrated and it would have looked better had grabbed the rim, but it was still a dunk by definition. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMP 424 Report post Posted February 7, 2012 Your opinion is irrelevant. A dunk is throwing the ball down through the hoop, hand doesn't have to touch the rim. Why does this need to be addressed further? And to your question, yes, that would be a dunk. It's also almost nearly impossible for any human being to be able to jump high enough from the 3pt line to be able to throw the ball down through the hoop, so it's pointless to even argue. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VCplusD12 91 Report post Posted February 7, 2012 A dunk is throwing the ball down into the basket. Technically speaking, that would be a three point dunk. I would agree that the Superman dunk was overrated and it would have looked better had grabbed the rim, but it was still a dunk by definition. Where do you draw the line between throwing and laying the ball in? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jec 427 Report post Posted February 7, 2012 Where do you draw the line between throwing and laying the ball in? There's a difference between throwing something downward and throwing something upward... That's pretty much it. It's pretty black and white. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheREALBrooksThompson 157 Report post Posted February 7, 2012 There's a difference between throwing something downward and throwing something upward... That's pretty much it. It's pretty black and white. Racist. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
O Town Terror 11 Report post Posted February 7, 2012 If the Queen had balls, would you refer to her as "King"? Does a one-legged duck swim in a circle? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KandiKane 136 Report post Posted February 7, 2012 Does a one-legged duck swim in a circle? The canals are all frozen here so i can not answer that question. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr13A 93 Report post Posted February 7, 2012 your book is flawed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites