BMP 424 Report post Posted December 19, 2010 Haters gonna hate... this team has always been doubted... just add to the list. This is hilarious coming from you because I'm almost 100% sure you were doubting the roster from 24 hours ago just as others are doubting this new team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Franchero MVP 391 Report post Posted December 19, 2010 Damnit we lost the Vince fanboys and have gained Hedu fanboys. I can't wait to see which is more annoying. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shock Phantom 263 Report post Posted December 19, 2010 Would anyone do Jameer for Gerald Wallace? Idk if I would before we see how well Arenas plays... http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=2argc7t ??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hungry Hedo's 29 Report post Posted December 19, 2010 This is hilarious coming from you because I'm almost 100% sure you were doubting the roster from 24 hours ago just as others are doubting this new team. Wow,, I was wrong for doubting that roster??? Otis agreed with me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMP 424 Report post Posted December 19, 2010 Wow,, I was wrong for doubting that roster??? Otis agreed with me. Haters gonna hate... this team has always been doubted... just add to the list. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hungry Hedo's 29 Report post Posted December 19, 2010 haha... I see what you did there... but only problem... not talking about those "good" teams that were doubted... twisting my words BMP. This years team deserved to be doubted and blown up. You love attacking me man... E.L.E. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0spFY1I2NQ 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MP_20 2 Report post Posted December 19, 2010 Offensively I think so. But the main problem was the slip in defense right? If the answer is to mask it with more points or fga then it's not going to end well. Also will need to see how this makes them surpass Boston. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMP 424 Report post Posted December 19, 2010 haha... iI see what you did there... but only problem... not talking about those "good" teams that were doubted... twisting my words BMP. This years team deserved to be doubted and blown up. You love attacking me man... E.L.E. Why? Because of a tough stretch of games? So did last year's team deserve to be doubted too?? They had a stretch of games where they went 9-8 (with a four game losing streak). What about the year the Magic went to the Finals? That team had a stretch of games where they went 4-5 and also a stretch where they went 9-8. How come those teams were so much better?? I can understand if a trade was made because of chemistry issues and players tuning out the coach and causing problems, but let's not sit here and pretend that a team that had won 6 games in a row but fell short due to injury and lack of defensive effort for a short stretch deserved to be blown up. The Magic are 5-5 in their last 10 games and that stretch is nowhere as bad as the one the team had in January last year or again the year before. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shock Phantom 263 Report post Posted December 19, 2010 Offensively I think so. But the main problem was the slip in defense right? If the answer is to mask it with more points or fga then it's not going to end well. Also will need to see how this makes them surpass Boston. Meh, this team's personnel isn't much worse than the personnel when we were the number 1 defense. It looks like all effort (or lack of) right now. I mean, losing Pietrus isn't great, but J-Rich is a better defender than Carter and Clark is a decent defender. Plus I can't tell you how many times I've found myself screaming at Pietrus for jumping on a pump fake. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThisIsTheYear 241 Report post Posted December 19, 2010 Offensively I think so. But the main problem was the slip in defense right? If the answer is to mask it with more points or fga then it's not going to end well. Also will need to see how this makes them surpass Boston. Name change on the horizon? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMP 424 Report post Posted December 19, 2010 Meh, this team's personnel isn't much worse than the personnel when we were the number 1 defense. It looks like all effort (or lack of) right now. I mean, losing Pietrus isn't great, but J-Rich is a better defender than Carter and Clark is a decent defender. Plus I can't tell you how many times I've found myself screaming at Pietrus for jumping on a pump fake. I'm gonna go ahead and say that Clee and Peaches >>>>>> Carter and Redick and >>>>>>>>>>>> Arenas and JRich in terms of defense Name change on the horizon? Looks like the curse of your name strikes again. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shock Phantom 263 Report post Posted December 19, 2010 Why? Because of a tough stretch of games? So did last year's team deserve to be doubted too?? They had a stretch of games where they went 9-8 (with a four game losing streak). What about the year the Magic went to the Finals? That team had a stretch of games where they went 4-5 and also a stretch where they went 9-8. How come those teams were so much better?? I can understand if a trade was made because of chemistry issues and players tuning out the coach and causing problems, but let's not sit here and pretend that a team that had won 6 games in a row but fell short due to injury and lack of defensive effort for a short stretch deserved to be blown up. The Magic are 5-5 in their last 10 games and that stretch is nowhere as bad as the one the team had in January last year or again the year before. I honestly think that was what was happening. Seemed like Dwight wasn't too pleased with Carter and MP. I read somewhere that the team was losing trust in each other. However, I wouldn't have minded us waiting until at least January to blow it up, but I see why Otis did this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites