Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You're Fat, Pat!

The Official 2009 NCAA Football Thread

Recommended Posts

quote:
Originally posted by Osprey23:

Utah should have had a share of the MNC last year, The BCS sucks, and my alma mater will beat UF today. BOOK IT

 

 

I can only hope.

 

 

 

Am I the only non-UF or Miami fan that thinks FSU will beat BYU?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by You're Fat, Pat!:

quote:
Originally posted by Osprey23:

Utah should have had a share of the MNC last year, The BCS sucks, and my alma mater will beat UF today. BOOK IT

 

 

I can only hope.

 

 

 

Am I the only non-UF or Miami fan that thinks FSU will beat BYU?

 

Well I am a Nole fan and I think they will win too.

 

Tebow INT grounding as we speak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by VaBchMagicFan:

quote:
Originally posted by SmackDaddy:

quote:
Originally posted by VaBchMagicFan:

Do you know how the BCS works? It matters what the ranking is at the end of the year. So saying SOS is weak now means nothing! How hard is this to understand?

 

I will make the same point I made earlier in this discussion then, since you now are presenting the BCS rankings & SOS as mutual counterparts.

 

Last year Utah was excluded from the BCS championship game, and even though they were the only team in the country to finish undefeated after pasting Bama, they were not even considered for a share of the Championship because they had the 56th ranked SOS. Every Gator fan and their sister was in favor of that decision. So if the same thing happens this year and UF is the only undefeated team, yet they have the 54th ranked SOS, while perhaps OKL, MIA, or VT completes the season with only one loss, all with top15 SOS, is it acceptable to exclude UF from championship consideration based upon the same criteria that won you the championship last year?

SOS schedule when? What will Florida's be if LSU keeps up and Bama is ranked in the top 5 in the SEC championship? The strength of schedule goes up, also SC is capable of being in the top 25 along with Georgia. Utah does not play in a major conference, thats what hurts them. Every team in the SEC is probably better than any other team in their conference. Once again for the last time, SOS means nothing till the end of the year, it is very likely that VT's and Miami drop since the ACC is not great. So what you want to happen is if Utah and BYU run the table if their strength of schedules are higher they should play in the NC? Thats what your saying, or even better a one loss Miami play instead of an undefeated Florida or Bama? If that were the case I would never watch CF again. Once again the SOS does not take into effect the SEC championship game.

 

Not making any sense since the last time I recall Bama got thumped by Utah.

And now we have BYU who beat the Sooners. The last time I checked BYU's strength of schedule is stronger then UF and that is including all of their SEC games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by Osprey23:

quote:
Originally posted by You're Fat, Pat!:

quote:
Originally posted by Osprey23:

Utah should have had a share of the MNC last year, The BCS sucks, and my alma mater will beat UF today. BOOK IT

 

 

I can only hope.

 

 

 

Am I the only non-UF or Miami fan that thinks FSU will beat BYU?

 

Well I am a Nole fan and I think they will win too.

 

Tebow INT grounding as we speak.

 

Your both so funny. Better chance that BYU keeps FSU scoreless then FSU winning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by PEC:

quote:
Originally posted by Osprey23:

quote:
Originally posted by You're Fat, Pat!:

quote:
Originally posted by Osprey23:

Utah should have had a share of the MNC last year, The BCS sucks, and my alma mater will beat UF today. BOOK IT

 

 

I can only hope.

 

 

 

Am I the only non-UF or Miami fan that thinks FSU will beat BYU?

 

Well I am a Nole fan and I think they will win too.

 

Tebow INT grounding as we speak.

 

Your both so funny. Better chance that BYU keeps FSU scoreless then FSU winning.

 

Thems fightin words

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by Nyce_1:

FSU's offense looks good early. The defense SUCKS though. We got lucky on that fumble.

 

yeah our safeties suck. We really count on being a big play defense just to make up the difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by PEC:

quote:
Originally posted by Osprey23:

quote:
Originally posted by You're Fat, Pat!:

quote:
Originally posted by Osprey23:

Utah should have had a share of the MNC last year, The BCS sucks, and my alma mater will beat UF today. BOOK IT

 

 

I can only hope.

 

 

 

Am I the only non-UF or Miami fan that thinks FSU will beat BYU?

 

Well I am a Nole fan and I think they will win too.

 

Tebow INT grounding as we speak.

 

Your both so funny. Better chance that BYU keeps FSU scoreless then FSU winning.

 

care to amend that statement?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by Nyce_1:

our kicker is sooo inconsistent

 

kickers are psychotic. missed that 1 ep now they are in his head.

 

can really boot out kickoffs though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by Lewis4thewin:

quote:
Originally posted by Nyce_1:

our kicker is sooo inconsistent

 

kickers are psychotic. missed that 1 ep now they are in his head.

 

can really boot out kickoffs though

that's for sure! haven't seen a leg on kickoff like that since Sebastian J.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×