Jump to content

gobucsmagic

Members
  • Posts

    464
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

gobucsmagic last won the day on July 18 2021

gobucsmagic had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

gobucsmagic's Achievements

Member

Member (2/4)

13

Reputation

  1. Wiseman to move back two picks. Ummm, absolutely. Then draft two of Kuminga, Moody, Booknight, Wagner
  2. Oh ****. I’d happily draft Suggs for GS and take back Wiseman and #7. That’s an absolute no-brainer
  3. I would puke all over myself and then become a Heat fan if we drafted Mitchell at #5 and Kispert at #8
  4. I think if we stay put we should swing for the fences with Kuminga at 5 and I’m on board for Boukknight at 8 barring a major player slipping
  5. Isaac, chuma, eventually Markelle, at least one rookie maybe two, and this doesn’t even include potential trades. Most of the G-league talent will be gone and all these guys will get a training camp together. It will be a completely different situation next year roster wise so there should be no residual effects
  6. My initial thought this was this is probably a move the non-tanking types would like, but then I remembered he played for OKC Thunder, so we’d have to hope he somehow recovers from that trauma like our guys are gonna have to
  7. Yikes. Possibly, but why would OKC possibly want more draft picks?
  8. Who’s they? The G-leaguers from last year or our actual team this coming season?
  9. If we kept Vuc we would have had to continue using him as a first option on offense moving forward (as his value decreases as a net negative on the defensive end) and I think that retards the process of handing the team over to Markelle and changing the tempo of the offense. Keeping Vuc probably helps us in the short-term (as in winning 3-5 more games this past season) and perhaps making the playoffs again next year as an 8th seed, but I’m not sure there’s any reason to believe a Vuc led team with younger pieces would be any better than what we’ve seen over the past 3-4 years, and in fact I’m fairly certain it would be the equivalent of same ****, different day. So yeah, it’s an alternative path but I’d stop short of saying it’s a better plan in either the short or long term really.
  10. The players aren’t damaged from 30 games of losing either. They aren’t that fragile
  11. Vuc as your best player is like not having a first round pick in a fantasy draft. You’re just never gonna be able to make up for it
  12. Why not take both?
  13. I understand the point of the article is surprise picks, but Moody at #5 better not happen. We are in no position to take anything other than absolute BPA
  14. True. But sample size is like 15 games also
×
×
  • Create New...