magicblue 315 Report post Posted December 6, 2016 Hey guys, think GS wants to get rid of Klay still? Don't think they ever did Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magicman28 295 Report post Posted December 6, 2016 Don't think they ever did I know just playing. There was an article out where it was suggesting that they might. I was more pointing out his 60 point game last night. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magicman28 295 Report post Posted December 6, 2016 I'd also get excited about this trade, though Ibaka is growing on me... http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=hzcz6dj Two PG'S? Don't think we trade Ibaka. We traded for him for a reason and he's a by reason why we're playing well. I also take Vogel's recent comments about not experimenting with him at the 5, YET, sorta telling. Think Vuch is possible, Payton and expirings like Green. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fultz4thewin 2,464 Report post Posted December 6, 2016 Two PG'S? Don't think we trade Ibaka. We traded for him for a reason and he's a by reason why we're playing well. I also take Vogel's recent comments about not experimenting with him at the 5, YET, sorta telling. Think Vuch is possible, Payton and expirings like Green. Lavine isn't a point guard despite what the trade machine says. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magicman28 295 Report post Posted December 6, 2016 Lavine isn't a point guard despite what the trade machine says. I know. We wouldn't run him as an traditional PG. He'd play there as our scoring PG like Westbrook does. Or we could play him at the two moving Fournier to SF, AG to PF although I don't think Vogel wants to start with that lineup. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fultz4thewin 2,464 Report post Posted December 6, 2016 I know. We wouldn't run him as an traditional PG. He'd play there as our scoring PG like Westbrook does. Or we could play him at the two moving Fournier to SF, AG to PF although I don't think Vogel wants to start with that lineup. no, Minnesota tried this for development purposes much like we did with Oladipo. Lavine is reeeeaaaaaallllly bad in that role. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Soul Bro 1,421 Report post Posted December 6, 2016 I'm actually quite interested in Jones, though he may be too raw for Vogel Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magicman28 295 Report post Posted December 6, 2016 no, Minnesota tried this for development purposes much like we did with Oladipo. Lavine is reeeeaaaaaallllly bad in that role. Yeah but Vuch was reeeeeeaaaallly bad at man defense too. I'm all for established players but they're either out of our league, health concerns or in the downward side of the hill, or don't move the needle much from what we have now. LaVine will never be an top pass first PG but maybe with Vogel teaching defense and Forcier working on other areas he can come around faster. We need scoring and we might have to bring in someone who has some issues but can flat out score and work on polishng up those issues. LaVine can flat out score. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magicman28 295 Report post Posted December 6, 2016 I'm actually quite interested in Jones, though he may be too raw for Vogel Jones? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Soul Bro 1,421 Report post Posted December 6, 2016 Jones? Tyus Jones. He was an absolute stud in high school, international ball and at Duke. Not quick or tall but poised. If we could get him for cheap from Minnesota, I think he could excel in Orlando, especially with the defenders we would have behind him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Soul Bro 1,421 Report post Posted December 6, 2016 As you can tell, I'm tired of the below average PG play in Orlando Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fultz4thewin 2,464 Report post Posted December 6, 2016 Yeah but Vuch was reeeeeeaaaallly bad at man defense too. I'm all for established players but they're either out of our league, health concerns or in the downward side of the hill, or don't move the needle much from what we have now. LaVine will never be an top pass first PG but maybe with Vogel teaching defense and Forcier working on other areas he can come around faster. We need scoring and we might have to bring in someone who has some issues but can flat out score and work on polishng up those issues. LaVine can flat out score. no, im not talking about defense. Lavine was bad at everything as a point guard. Forcing passes. turning the ball over. Assist percentage was really low for a pg. Plus he's said himself he's much more comfortable off ball. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites