Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Hoezzz33

The Magic are still missing a few pieces to compete for a title....

Recommended Posts

The magic need to improve the bench before they can become the real deal. They are blowing leads as soon as the scorers come off the floor.

 

1. Jameer

2. Artest

3. Turk

4. Lewis

5. D-12

 

Wow

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The magic need to improve the bench before they can become the real deal. They are blowing leads as soon as the scorers come off the floor.

 

1. Jameer

2. Artest

3. Turk

4. Lewis

5. D-12

 

Wow

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Artest will never happen. Frankly I don't know why guys on this board keep fantasizing about it. It's mute point.

 

Back on subject, I see us getting another big guy who can help us and Dwight on the boards.

 

Go Magic! Beta the Spurs!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You say we need to improve our bench but then suggest we make a trade for Artest?

 

Open your eyes. We just improved our bench. Evans and Cook can both score and defend (one better than the other). With them two, Arroyo, Dooling, Turk, and Foyle, our 2nd unit should be able to hold our leads...or atleast not BLOW IT like they have been.

 

We're in good shape. Our starting lineup won't be affected; unless they really show skills in practice and their PT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by Nyce_1:

You say we need to improve our bench but then suggest we make a trade for Artest?

 

Open your eyes. We just improved our bench. Evans and Cook can both score and defend (one better than the other). With them two, Arroyo, Dooling, Turk, and Foyle, our 2nd unit should be able to hold our leads...or atleast not BLOW IT like they have been.

 

We're in good shape. Our starting lineup won't be affected; unless they really show skills in practice and their PT.

 

I totally agree man. People are missing the point here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes no sense, how does Artest help our bench?

 

Especially considering we would have to trade bench players to get Artest. Besides Otis is not going to bring in a problem child to fix a starting unit that is 10-2 and 7-0 on the road!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by Nyce_1:

You say we need to improve our bench but then suggest we make a trade for Artest?

 

Open your eyes. We just improved our bench. Evans and Cook can both score and defend (one better than the other). With them two, Arroyo, Dooling, Turk, and Foyle, our 2nd unit should be able to hold our leads...or atleast not BLOW IT like they have been.

 

We're in good shape. Our starting lineup won't be affected; unless they really show skills in practice and their PT.

 

Agree with you Nyce, and agree with Junk.

First this thread miss the point at the begining,a nd the trade for artest probably don

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quote:
Originally posted by Nyce_1:

You say we need to improve our bench but then suggest we make a trade for Artest?

 

Open your eyes. We just improved our bench. Evans and Cook can both score and defend (one better than the other). With them two, Arroyo, Dooling, Turk, and Foyle, our 2nd unit should be able to hold our leads...or atleast not BLOW IT like they have been.

 

We're in good shape. Our starting lineup won't be affected; unless they really show skills in practice and their PT.

 

Exactly. I mean God, can Evans and Cook put ON a Magic uniform before looking to improve the team further?? Geez, give Otis and SVG some evaluation time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×