Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Nash on the team would be sick, not gonna lie. Yes, his defense is suspect, but that's why we have Dwight and a good team defense philosophy.

 

Our offense would do wonders. Our defense, with Dwight anchoring it, would still be very very good; in fact, I don't think it will change much with the way Jameers been playing as of late. He can't defend or offer anything on offense.

Posted

Nash on the team would be sick, not gonna lie. Yes, his defense is suspect, but that's why we have Dwight and a good team defense philosophy.

 

Our offense would do wonders. Our defense, with Dwight anchoring it, would still be very very good; in fact, I don't think it will change much with the way Jameers been playing as of late. He can't defend or offer anything on offense.

Nash is going to decompose with this schedule structure

Posted

Nash on the team would be sick, not gonna lie. Yes, his defense is suspect, but that's why we have Dwight and a good team defense philosophy.

 

Our offense would do wonders. Our defense, with Dwight anchoring it, would still be very very good; in fact, I don't think it will change much with the way Jameers been playing as of late. He can't defend or offer anything on offense.

 

Exactly, its not like we'd be losing anything defensively.

 

I wonder what we'd have to give up to get Nash. Although, it likely doesn't matter, being that Nash won't ask to be traded.

Posted

Our offense is (was before this last game) tied for best in the league in terms of offensive efficiency. Our defense, which has traditionally been better than our offense and tops in the league has been slipping and is in the middle of the pack (18th overall).

Posted

we need a PG and backup C.

 

how do you like a trade with Cavs if we could get Sessions and Varejao? yes, of course there are better players available but I am just trying to be optimistic...

Posted

we need a PG and backup C.

 

how do you like a trade with Cavs if we could get Sessions and Varejao? yes, of course there are better players available but I am just trying to be optimistic...

Depends on the price, as does any trade

Posted

I don't want Sessions, but I would take Flop. Doubt we'd give up anything of significance for him, though.

 

What I love about the Nash idea is that he's a creator and doesn't lock us in long-term. Even if we only have him for a year or two, he'd improve everyone around him. I'd hate to give up either JJ or Anderson in some combo, but if we got back Nash and a prospect, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Or perhaps we'd simply need to take back a bad contract from Phoenix. Either way, I'd like to see our pg position upgraded, even if it meant keeping Nelson and having him come off the bench.

Posted

Nash on the team would be sick, not gonna lie. Yes, his defense is suspect, but that's why we have Dwight and a good team defense philosophy.

 

Our offense would do wonders. Our defense, with Dwight anchoring it, would still be very very good; in fact, I don't think it will change much with the way Jameers been playing as of late. He can't defend or offer anything on offense.

 

Without the sun's trainers he'd dissolve into ash before he stepped off the plane. That said, Id trade for him anyway

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...