Magicfanagain Posted July 24, 2010 Report Posted July 24, 2010 From the clutches of pure evil (Nets fans...and well, that entire organization)! Having spent a full year on message boards for both the Magic and the Nets, I'd like to say thanks to everyone on here for not being complete and total d-bags to every player on the team. The Nets fans are ridiculous. At any rate, here's my thinking... Otis never wanted to give up C. Lee in the first place and Lee is hopefully not dumb enough to re-up with the Nets after this season and becomes a FA. Orlando sends a package of Nelson, VC, Ryan Anderson and maybe Reddick or picks to New Orleans for CP3 and whatever else makes the salaries work. Orlando then either pulls a trade to get Lee back (Gortat?) or has Howard (his good buddy) ensure Lee becomes a FA and signs with Orlando next year. Orlando's lineup: PG - CP3 SG - Reddick/Lee SF - Pietrus PF - Lewis C - Howard Sixth Man - Reddick/Lee Balanced lineup with obvious studs at Point and Center, with shooters and defenders all around...screw off Miami! P.S. - Who the heck does Miami think is gonna cover Howard? Magloire? HAHAHA Quote
Nyce_1 Posted July 24, 2010 Report Posted July 24, 2010 without CLee, we possibly couldn't have traded for Vince, and therefore, not be in this position to trade for Paul. The two players I want back on this roster, more than anything are Lee & Ariza. Quote
Orlandonole Posted July 24, 2010 Report Posted July 24, 2010 Plus remember we are going to have to take back Emeka's contract so that's a big number to pay a back up PF/C to take Gortat's place when he goes to NO. Quote
Give Me Redick All Day Posted July 24, 2010 Report Posted July 24, 2010 Please remember that we'll have CHRIS FREAKING PAUL on our team. That is all. Quote
BMP Posted July 24, 2010 Report Posted July 24, 2010 CLee would be the starting shooting guard for the Magic, not Redick. With that being said, they would still get around the same amount of minutes. Quote
Give Me Redick All Day Posted July 24, 2010 Report Posted July 24, 2010 quote: Originally posted by ButterMilkPancakes: CLee would be the starting shooting guard for the Magic, not Redick. With that being said, they would still get around the same amount of minutes. Racist. Quote
sharp/7/shooter Posted July 24, 2010 Report Posted July 24, 2010 quote: Originally posted by ButterMilkPancakes: CLee would be the starting shooting guard for the Magic, not Redick. With that being said, they would still get around the same amount of minutes. I don't know about that. I don't think we would let someone who was just signed under a $20 million plus contract play behind a prospect coming into his 3rd year in the league. And why are we talking about Courtney? I'm upset just as much as everyone else that we traded him...but are the Magic trade talking with New Jersey? Quote
BMP Posted July 24, 2010 Report Posted July 24, 2010 quote: Originally posted by sharp[7]shooter: quote: Originally posted by ButterMilkPancakes: CLee would be the starting shooting guard for the Magic, not Redick. With that being said, they would still get around the same amount of minutes. I don't know about that. I don't think we would let someone who was just signed under a $20 million plus contract play behind a prospect coming into his 3rd year in the league. And why are we talking about Courtney? I'm upset just as much as everyone else that we traded him...but are the Magic trade talking with New Jersey? Just in response to the thread and the line-up he posted. If Courtney Lee came back to the Magic, he would start over Redick. They would both split minutes. It would be a bit like Barnes/Pietrus, but for different reasons. No matter how much Redick is determined and works hard, he can still be a liability defending a lot of the bigger guards in the league. Quote
VinceCarter4life Posted July 24, 2010 Report Posted July 24, 2010 quote: Originally posted by Magicfanagain: I'd like to say thanks to everyone on here for not being complete and total d-bags to every player on the team whoa dont go too far.. and btw Redick > Lee. Quote
Audi Posted July 24, 2010 Report Posted July 24, 2010 im suprised people have been so forgiving of CLee's missed layup. Quote
Fultz4thewin Posted July 24, 2010 Report Posted July 24, 2010 quote: Originally posted by Audi: im suprised people have been so forgiving of CLee's missed layup. its not like he had a wide open layup. It was an alley oop on a last second play that he caught almost behind the backboard. He was being held and had to toss up a quick attempt as his momentum was carrying him out of bounds. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.