FENDI Posted June 30, 2010 Report Posted June 30, 2010 quote: QUESTION: Hey JD! Otis Smith didn Quote
Captain Hindsight Posted June 30, 2010 Report Posted June 30, 2010 i've moved on from barnes. he did well but it's a matter of numbers and it just won't work out. Quote
Walddo Posted June 30, 2010 Report Posted June 30, 2010 I like him, but not for big money. And I kinda hated seeing him get destroyed by pierce, when Barnes biggest attribute was supposed to be defense. Good guy, but only for the right price. Quote
VCplusD12 Posted June 30, 2010 Report Posted June 30, 2010 He would only be making a bit more than Bass. I'd love Barnes back, I love his toughness but he got burned by Pierce over and over and over again. IDK, **** it Let Otis do his job. Quote
magicfanejc42 Posted June 30, 2010 Report Posted June 30, 2010 If Barnes is looking for $5 mil a season, he won't be playing anywhere let alone Orlando. He not only was only mediocre at guarding Pierce, he was a constant liability on offense all year. Without being able to make a shot from anywhere otehr than a layup defenders didn't even have to think about guarding him. (Though, this is on SVG a bit, when you have a player who can't shoot he should slash more. but he sat in the corner..That's on Stan.) Quote
magicLA Posted June 30, 2010 Report Posted June 30, 2010 I love Barnes on the team - but he's not a starter. He's "asking" for $5m multiple years. He's getting $1.6m this yr. Hopefully he negotiates down to around $3.5m/3yrs because he definitely is the type of player a championship team usually has coming off their bench. Quote
Miller4Prez64 Posted June 30, 2010 Report Posted June 30, 2010 The problem is, any money used to re-sign him goes against our MLE. So I don't see him back. Quote
Nell2ThaIzzay Posted June 30, 2010 Report Posted June 30, 2010 Man, it seems to me that Barnes actually did okay on Pierce. I don't remember Barnes getting lit up by Pierce. Quote
magicLA Posted June 30, 2010 Report Posted June 30, 2010 quote: Originally posted by Miller4Prez64:The problem is, any money used to re-sign him goes against our MLE. So I don't see him back. ugh man how do we use that MLE (around $6m) 1: to sign Barnes and a 3d PG or 2: sign JJ and 3d PG or 3: fill our 2nd and 3d PG holes... very tough decision because we lose key elements either way. There has to be a trade no matter what. Quote
GhostAnime Posted June 30, 2010 Report Posted June 30, 2010 quote: (Though, this is on SVG a bit, when you have a player who can't shoot he should slash more. but he sat in the corner..That's on Stan.) do you have any idea what you're talking about? Quote
Murphy13 Posted June 30, 2010 Report Posted June 30, 2010 quote: Originally posted by ezzzp: quote: Originally posted by Miller4Prez64:The problem is, any money used to re-sign him goes against our MLE. So I don't see him back. ugh man how do we use that MLE (around $6m) 1: to sign Barnes and a 3d PG or 2: sign JJ and 3d PG or 3: fill our 2nd and 3d PG holes... very tough decision because we lose key elements either way. There has to be a trade no matter what. I dont know the answer to your question but I do know that restriced FA's dont require the use of exceptions due to their bird rights. Therefore, we dont need to use an exception to retain the rights of Redick. But, I bet Redick is a goner anyway. Its a shame we cant keep Barnes, too bad he is stuck on opting out of his contract(he signed a two year deal). If it werent for the CBA expiring after next season I bet he doesnt opt out. He would actually be worth what he's asking if he came back improved next season and we won the 'ship. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.