I would argue that the decision to use a tanking strategy 10 years ago is what started us on this long downward spiral. We’ve drafted relatively high most of the past 10 years and that didn’t help us much either. Many of the players touted in past drafts haven’t turned out to be all that great; certainly not franchise changers. And many players drafted after we used our picks have been better than what we drafted. I still think there’s no substitute for committing to the hard work of building a team, as opposed to hoping for a draft miracle. That includes developing young players that you have, smart trades to get necessary veterans, hopefully getting a break or two in the draft, but never tanking, which confuses the players and sets the wrong expectations.
Anyway I realize we are not going to agree on this but I appreciate the discussion. I believe most people on here agree with you but I think it’s worth presenting both sides.